Reading Time
7 MINUTE READ
A Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) is an application for protection made by a person in Canada who is subject to a removal order, asking the government to decide whether sending them back would expose them to persecution, torture, a risk to life, or cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
Contents: Legal basis · How the process works · Risk grounds and new evidence · Decisions and judicial review · Related terms · Practical tips · FAQ
The PRRA is created by sections 112 to 114 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). Under section 112(1), a person in Canada may apply to the Minister for protection if they are subject to a removal order in force or are named in a security certificate.
Section 112(2) limits who may apply:
Under section 112(2.1), the Minister may exempt nationals of a country, a region of a country, or a class of persons from these waiting periods. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR), sections 160 to 174 and 232, set out the procedure.
Notice. An eligible person is notified before removal that they may apply (IRPR s. 160). Notice is given when the form is handed over or, if mailed, seven days after it is sent.
The 15-day window. An application received within 15 days after notification is timely under IRPR s. 162. Under IRPR s. 232, the removal order is stayed from notification until the earliest of several events, such as the person not applying within that period or the application being rejected. A late application (s. 163) or a repeat application (s. 165) does not stay removal.
Submissions and evidence. The applicant may file written submissions, with the help of counsel at their own expense, and must identify the evidence that meets the new evidence rule and explain how it relates to them (IRPR s. 161).
Hearing. Most PRRAs are decided on paper. A hearing may be held under IRPA s. 113(b) based on the factors in IRPR s. 167: whether evidence raises a serious credibility issue related to sections 96 and 97, whether it is central to the decision, and whether it would justify allowing the application if accepted.
For most applicants, the officer considers IRPA sections 96 to 98 (s. 113(c)):
The new evidence rule. If the refugee claim was rejected, IRPA s. 113(a) allows only evidence that arose after the rejection, or that was not reasonably available or could not reasonably have been presented then. In Raza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FCA 385, the Federal Court of Appeal set out five questions: credibility, relevance, newness, materiality and the express statutory conditions. A PRRA is not a second refugee hearing. Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FCA 96, adapts the Raza factors to new evidence before the Refugee Appeal Division, not to the PRRA itself.
Restricted PRRA. Under section 112(3), refugee protection may not be conferred on certain applicants, such as those inadmissible for security, human rights violations, organized criminality or certain serious criminality. For most of them, the assessment is limited to section 97 plus danger to the public or the nature and severity of their acts (s. 113(d)), with an exception for some serious criminality cases (s. 113(e)).
A positive PRRA confers refugee protection on most applicants (IRPA s. 114(1)(a)). For an applicant described in section 112(3), it only stays removal to the country where they face risk (s. 114(1)(b)).
A negative decision can be challenged by judicial review. The leave application must be filed within 15 days after the applicant learns of the decision (IRPA s. 72(2)(b)). Filing does not automatically stop removal: in He v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 517, at paragraph 54, the Federal Court confirmed there is no automatic stay pending judicial review of a negative PRRA. A separate stay may be requested under section 18.2 of the Federal Courts Act.
Parliament has also enacted the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act (S.C. 2026, c. 4), which deals with refugee-claim ineligibility. Under IRPA s. 101(1)(b.1), a claim is ineligible if the claimant entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and claimed more than one year after entry, and the Act requires the Minister to report how many such claimants later applied for a PRRA.
A person in Canada who is subject to a removal order in force, or named in a security certificate, unless a bar in IRPA s. 112(2) applies.
A person generally cannot apply until 12 months after the last negative decision on their refugee claim or previous PRRA, or 36 months for nationals of designated countries.
An application received within 15 days after notification is timely under IRPR s. 162 and benefits from the stay of removal. A later application does not stay removal.
No. If your claim was rejected, you may present only new evidence that meets IRPA s. 113(a), as explained in Raza v. Canada, 2007 FCA 385.
Usually not. A hearing may be held when credibility evidence is central and could justify allowing the application (IRPA s. 113(b); IRPR s. 167).
Most applicants receive refugee protection. Applicants described in section 112(3) receive only a stay of removal to the country where they face risk.
Not automatically. You must ask the Federal Court for a stay, which it may grant at its discretion (He v. Canada, 2026 FC 517).
Pax Law Corporation offers immigration and refugee consultations online or by phone. Book in Vancouver (+1 604-767-9529) or Book in Toronto (+1 416-447-4862).
This entry is for general information only and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation, please book a consultation with a lawyer.
The information presented is for informational and educational purposes only and may not be accurate. This information does not replace getting legal advice from a qualified, practicing lawyer. If you are facing a legal dilemma, you should make an appointment and consult with one of our licensed and practicing lawyers.
Super Visa insurance and requirements for parents and grandparents: eligibility, insurance, host income, medical exam, length of stay, refusals and Federal Court review.
How BC probate fees work: the $200 filing fee, the $6 and $14 per $1,000 rates, what counts as estate value, worked examples and lawful ways to reduce fees.
Is the IRCC backlog a legal excuse? Learn how the Federal Court decides when an immigration delay becomes unreasonable, how processing times and security screening are treated, and when mandamus can help.
We use cookies to measure visits and improve this website. Choose whether to allow them.
0 Comments