
BC Probate Fees: How They Are Calculated and What Counts as Estate Value
How BC probate fees work: the $200 filing fee, the $6 and $14 per $1,000 rates, what counts as estate value, worked examples and lawful ways to reduce fees.
Immigration and Refugees Law
Reading Time
11 MINUTE READ
A Super Visa is a temporary resident visa for the parents and grandparents of a Canadian citizen or permanent resident who want to make an extended visit. On top of the ordinary visitor-visa test, the applicant must show private medical insurance that qualifies, complete an immigration medical examination, and be invited by a host whose income meets the legal minimum for the size of the family group.
This guide explains where the Super Visa rules come from, what the insurance requirement means in practice, how the host’s income is measured, how long a Super Visa holder may stay, and what the Federal Court has said when refusals were challenged. Some operational details, such as the minimum coverage amount, are set out in IRCC guidance that is updated from time to time, so this article points you to the source instead of repeating figures that may have changed.
Key takeaways
Table of contents
Legally, the Super Visa is a temporary resident visa issued to a person who wants to visit a child or grandchild who is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident for an extended period. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (IRPA) recognizes the category in two places: s. 15.1, which deals with private health insurance bought from an insurer outside Canada, and s. 29(3), which sets a longer period of stay for these visitors.
The detailed criteria are found in ministerial instructions, not in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (IRPR). Section 193 of the IRPR says only that a visitor is subject to the conditions imposed under Part 9. The general test for a temporary resident visa is in s. 179, which requires, among other things, that the applicant will leave Canada by the end of the authorized stay, holds a valid passport or travel document, meets the requirements of the class, and is not inadmissible. The IRPA also accepts “dual intent”: wanting to immigrate in the future does not by itself prevent a temporary stay, provided the officer is satisfied the person will leave when required (IRPA, s. 22(2)).
You can read the current text of the legislation on the Government of Canada’s Justice Laws website: the IRPA and the IRPR. IRCC explains the program on its Super Visa page.
The 2023 Ministerial Instructions, as set out by the Federal Court in Prabha v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 579 at para 15, say that an officer should consider issuing a Super Visa where the applicant, in addition to meeting every requirement for a temporary resident visa, has:
The Instructions use the words “should consider”, so meeting the list does not make approval automatic. The Federal Court has also confirmed that the host’s total before-tax annual income must reach the minimum necessary income for the group of people affected (Yu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1030 at para 4). Because IRCC’s own checklists change, compare this summary with the current instructions on the IRCC website before you apply.
The insurance requirement is the part of the Super Visa that people ask about most often. Three points are well supported by the sources we checked.
Who may issue the policy. The policy must come from a Canadian insurance company or from an insurer outside Canada that the Minister has approved. Section 15.1 of the IRPA states that a policy from an approved foreign insurer satisfies an instruction requiring private health insurance for this type of visit. A foreign policy is therefore not automatically acceptable; the insurer itself must be approved.
How long it must last. The IRCC web page quoted by the Federal Court in Prabha (version modified 11 September 2024, at para 16) says the applicant must show proof of private medical insurance valid for at least one year from the date of entry. IRCC may have updated its wording since that version, so check the current page.
Coverage details. IRCC’s published guidance sets the minimum coverage amount and what the policy must cover. We do not repeat those figures here because they are set by IRCC rather than by statute, and an out-of-date number in an article is worse than none. Read the current IRCC page, and ask the insurer to confirm in writing that its policy is intended to meet the Super Visa requirement.
The evidence also has to match the people and the travel. In Mfudi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1319 at para 14, the insurance showed that only one parent was covered and that the policy would start two months after the parents arrived in Canada. That decision describes the rules as they stood in 2019, including a Canadian-insurer requirement that has since been widened to approved foreign insurers, so rely on it for the lesson about evidence, not for the current rule.
As practical points, each traveller should be named on a policy that covers the entire visit period required by IRCC, the effective dates should line up with the planned arrival, and the proof you submit should be the policy documents rather than a quotation.
The child or grandchild who invites you is called the host. Section 2 of the IRPR defines “minimum necessary income” as the amount identified in Statistics Canada’s most recent low income cut-off publication for urban areas of 500,000 people or more, for a group equal in size to the host and the host’s family members, the visiting parents or grandparents and their family members, and anyone else the host has an undertaking in effect for.
Two consequences follow. First, there is no single Super Visa dollar figure; the threshold changes each year and rises with the number of people in the group. Second, the group is counted broadly, so a host who already supports others, or who has sponsored someone, should count carefully. IRCC publishes the current table on its website.
The Instructions also require a letter of invitation from the host. The letter is the host’s own statement, so it should be accurate and consistent with the rest of the file: the relationship, the purpose and intended length of the visit, where the visitors will stay and how the visit will be supported. Check IRCC’s current host guidance for exactly what the letter should include.
The applicants’ own circumstances still matter. In Prabha at para 18, the Court upheld a refusal where the applicant did not meet the general financial requirements for a temporary resident visa, because it was reasonable for the officer not to move on to the Super Visa criteria. In Pinzon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 945 at para 11, by contrast, the Court set aside a refusal where the officer discounted evidence that the applicants’ daughter and her spouse would pay for the trip and the stay. For more on how financial evidence is assessed, see our article on proof of funds.
A Super Visa applicant must complete an immigration medical examination under s. 29 of the IRPR and must not be inadmissible on health grounds under s. 38(1) of the IRPA. This is an added Super Visa criterion; it does not apply in the same way to every ordinary visitor. Where an applicant is required to undergo an examination, s. 30(3) of the IRPR calls for a medical certificate based on an examination carried out within the previous 12 months.
The file should show that the examination was completed. In Mfudi at para 16, the absence of proof of the required medical examination was one of the reasons the Court gave for upholding the refusal. IRCC explains how to arrange the examination and how the result reaches the officer; follow its current instructions rather than relying on a general description.
Section 29(3) of the IRPA provides that a temporary resident who is authorized to enter and remain in Canada for an extended period to visit a child or grandchild who is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident may stay for a period of five years. That is longer than the default for other visitors; under s. 183(2) of the IRPR the usual period is six months unless an officer fixes a different one. Older articles and some court decisions describe shorter stays, including a 2023 decision that referred to stays of up to two years (Nimrani v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1448 at para 26), so check the date of any source you rely on.
A person who wants to stay longer must apply to extend the authorization before the current one ends (IRPR, s. 181(1)). The officer extends it if the person still meets the s. 179 requirements (s. 181(2)). If a timely extension application has not been decided by the time the authorized stay ends, s. 183(5) continues the period until a decision is made, and s. 183(6) addresses status during that time, subject to conditions. IRCC may apply its own operational limits to extensions, which we could not confirm from the legislation, so check the current IRCC guidance.
Refusal letters tend to rely on a short list of grounds. The Federal Court decisions we reviewed show the following themes:
A refusal on one ground does not necessarily mean the other requirements were met or not met. The reasons in the refusal letter and the officer’s notes are the starting point for deciding what to do next.
The Federal Court reviews immigration decisions on the reasonableness standard, asking whether the decision is justified, transparent and intelligible in light of the record. The following decisions illustrate how that works for Super Visa files. They are examples, not predictions, and each turned on its own evidence.
Sharifi does not make family ties irrelevant to the leave-at-the-end-of-the-stay assessment. It cautions against treating the very relationship that makes a person eligible as a reason to refuse without a reasoned assessment of the whole record. We did not find a Federal Court decision that sets the minimum insurance coverage amount or the required coverage categories, which is another reason to rely on IRCC’s current guidance for those details.
A refusal does not close the door permanently, but the right next step depends on the reasons given.
The person refused, not the host, is generally the party who brings the application, as Mfudi shows. If the refusal relied on a standard template reason, our article on boilerplate visa refusals may also be useful. Information about the visitor visa process more generally is on our visitor visa page.
It is a temporary resident visa for the parents and grandparents of a Canadian citizen or permanent resident who want to make an extended visit. The IRPA recognizes the category in s. 15.1 (health insurance) and s. 29(3) (period of stay), and detailed criteria are set out in ministerial instructions.
Yes. The 2023 Ministerial Instructions, as set out in Prabha, 2026 FC 579 at para 15, require satisfactory evidence of a health insurance policy from a Canadian insurer or from an insurer outside Canada that the Minister has approved.
Only if the Minister has approved the insurer. Section 15.1 of the IRPA says a policy from an approved foreign insurer satisfies the insurance requirement, so a policy from an unapproved foreign company is not enough.
IRCC publishes the minimum coverage amount and the coverage the policy must include. Because that guidance is set by IRCC and can be updated, check the current IRCC Super Visa page before buying a policy, and ask the insurer to confirm in writing that the policy is intended to meet it.
The IRCC web page quoted in Prabha (version modified 11 September 2024) refers to coverage valid for at least one year from the date of entry. Confirm the current wording on IRCC’s site, since it may have changed.
Yes. The host’s total before-tax annual income must reach the minimum necessary income, which is based on Statistics Canada’s low income cut-off for urban areas of 500,000 or more and depends on the number of people in the group (IRPR, s. 2; Yu, 2025 FC 1030 at para 4).
Yes. A Super Visa applicant must complete an examination under s. 29 of the IRPR and must not be inadmissible on health grounds under s. 38(1) of the IRPA. Keep proof that it was completed.
Section 29(3) of the IRPA provides for a period of stay of five years for a temporary resident authorized to visit a Canadian citizen or permanent resident child or grandchild for an extended period. Some older sources describe shorter periods, so check the date of any source.
You can apply to extend before your authorized stay ends (IRPR, s. 181(1)). If a timely application has not been decided when the period ends, s. 183(5) continues the period until a decision is made. IRCC may apply operational limits that you should confirm on its website.
The 2023 Ministerial Instructions list applying from outside Canada as one of the criteria, so an application made from inside Canada does not meet that criterion.
Yes. The officer must also be satisfied that you meet the general temporary resident visa requirements, including that you will leave Canada at the end of your authorized stay and that you are not inadmissible. In Prabha, the refusal was upheld because the applicant’s own financial evidence did not meet the general requirement.
Family ties in Canada are part of the leave-at-the-end-of-the-stay assessment, but in Sharifi, 2026 FC 99 at para 8, the Federal Court said it does not make sense to draw a negative inference from ties to the children and grandchildren who are the reason for the visit, since visiting them is the only purpose of the program.
Yes, through an application for leave and judicial review. The deadline is 15 days if the decision was made in Canada and 60 days if it was made outside Canada (IRPA, s. 72(2)(b)). The Court reviews the decision for reasonableness and fairness, and it does not issue the visa itself.
Generally the person refused is the applicant. In Mfudi, 2019 FC 1319, the Court held that the Canadian daughter did not have standing to bring the review on her parents’ behalf.
If you or a family member are planning a Super Visa application, or have received a refusal, Pax Law Corporation is a general practice with offices in North Vancouver and Toronto. Dr. Samin Mortazavi offers immigration and refugee law services across Canada and internationally through the Vancouver office. You can book a consultation with either office to discuss your situation.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Immigration rules, IRCC guidance and fees change, and every application is different. Speak with a lawyer about your own circumstances before acting.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. The law can change and every case is different. Reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship. For advice about your own situation, please book a consultation with a lawyer.

How BC probate fees work: the $200 filing fee, the $6 and $14 per $1,000 rates, what counts as estate value, worked examples and lawful ways to reduce fees.

Is the IRCC backlog a legal excuse? Learn how the Federal Court decides when an immigration delay becomes unreasonable, how processing times and security screening are treated, and when mandamus can help.

Using your national passport can lead to refugee cessation under IRPA s 108 and loss of PR status. Learn the Galindo Camayo factors. Pax Law Corporation.
دفتر وکالت پکس لا
پکس لا
سلام! وقت مشاورهی خود را بهسرعت از طریق واتساپ رزرو کنید. تیم ما در اسرع وقت پاسخ خواهد داد.
Pax Law Corporation
Pax Law
Hello! Book your consultation quickly via WhatsApp. Our team will reply as soon as possible.
We use cookies to measure visits and improve this website. Choose whether to allow them.
0 Comments