Judicial review in the Canadian immigration system is a legal process where the Federal Court reviews a decision made by an immigration officer, board, or tribunal to ensure it was made according to law. This process does not re-assess the facts of your case or the evidence you submitted; instead, Read more…
Several media outlets show interest in one of Dr. Samin Mortazavi‘s recent Court cases
کیس موکل محترم دکتر مرتضوی، آقای جهانتیغ رسانه ای شد
Judicial Review Decision – Taghdiri v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (2023 FC 1516) The blog post discusses a judicial review case involving the rejection of Maryam Taghdiri’s study permit application for Canada, which had consequences for her family’s visa applications. The review resulted in a grant for all applicants. Read more…
Introduction At Pax Law Corporation, we are committed to providing transparent and efficient communication with our clients throughout the judicial review application process. As part of our dedication to keeping you informed, we offer a follow-up table that allows you to track the progress of your case easily. This blog Read more…
Introduction Making decisions in immigration and citizenship applications is a complex process that involves adhering to the principles of procedural fairness. At Pax Law Corporation, we understand the vital importance of procedural fairness in maintaining a just and equitable immigration system. In this blog post, we will delve into the Read more…
Introduction In a recent Federal Court decision, Safarian v Canada (MCI), 2023 FC 775, the Federal Court challenged the excessive use of boilerplate or bald statements and examined the denial of a study permit to the Applicant, Mr. Safarian. The decision shed light on the requirements for reasonable decision-making by Read more…
Introduction In this case, study permit and temporary resident visa applications were refused by an immigration officer due to an unreasonable assessment of the Study Permit. The officer based their decision on concerns about the applicants’ personal assets and financial status. Also, an officer doubted their intention to leave Canada Read more…
Introduction Fatih Yuzer, a Turkish citizen, faced a setback when his application for a study permit in Canada was denied, and he applied for Judicial Review. Yuzer’s aspirations of advancing his architectural studies and enhancing his English proficiency in Canada were halted. He contended that similar programs were unavailable in Read more…
In the case of Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 497, the applicants, Samunder Singh, his wife Lajwinder Kaur, and their minor child, were citizens of India and sought judicial review of individual decisions by a visa officer dated June 3, 2022. The visa officer refused their temporary Read more…
Introduction Most of our visa refusal cases which are taken to the Federal Court for judicial review deal with whether or not the visa officer’s decision was reasonable. However, there may be times where a visa officer has breached procedural fairness by treating the applicant unfairly. We will explore our Read more…