
One IRCC Verification Call, a Five-Year Ban: Misrepresentation and the Innocent Mistake Defence
A single IRCC verification call can trigger a misrepresentation finding under IRPA s 40. Learn your rights and the innocent mistake exception.
Immigration and Refugees Law
Reading Time
3 MINUTE READ
Can a refugee lose protection in Canada for travelling home or using their national passport? Yes. Under section 108(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), refugee protection can cease if a person has voluntarily re-availed themselves of the protection of their country of nationality—for example, by obtaining or renewing that country’s passport and travelling on it. The Minister may apply to the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) to cease protection. For protected persons who became permanent residents, a cessation decision can also result in the loss of permanent resident status. The presumption of re-availment can be rebutted with evidence. Pax Law Corporation represents protected persons facing cessation applications.
| Issue | Rule | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Ground for cessation | Voluntary re-availment of the protection of one’s country of nationality | IRPA s 108(1)(a) |
| Who decides | The RPD, on application by the Minister | IRPA s 108(2) |
| Effect on permanent residents | Loss of PR status on a final cessation determination under s 108(1)(a)–(d) | IRPA s 46(1)(c.1) |
| Inadmissibility | Inadmissible following a final cessation determination under s 108(1)(a)–(d) | IRPA s 40.1(2) |
| Assessing re-availment | Voluntariness, intention and actual re-availment; the presumption can be rebutted | Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Galindo Camayo, 2022 FCA 50 |
A passport is a request for the protection of the state that issues it. When a refugee applies for, renews or travels on their national passport, the law presumes they have re-placed themselves under that state’s protection. Travel back to the country of feared persecution makes that presumption stronger. Cessation is not limited to people who have not yet become permanent residents, so it remains a risk for many protected persons who later obtained PR status.
In Galindo Camayo, 2022 FCA 50, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the RPD must look at the individual’s actual circumstances rather than treating passport use as automatically conclusive. Relevant factors include:
These factors guide an individualized assessment rather than operating as a rigid checklist. Lack of knowledge of the consequences is relevant but not decisive on its own.
The Minister files an application with the RPD and discloses evidence, often including passport records and travel history obtained at the border. The protected person can file evidence, testify and make submissions. Preparation typically includes a detailed affidavit explaining each trip and each passport application, documents supporting the reasons for travel, and evidence of the person’s continuing fear.
A final cessation decision means refugee protection ends. For permanent residents, cessation under s 108(1)(a)–(d) can lead to loss of PR status and inadmissibility, with limited routes for relief. A cessation decision may be challenged by application for leave and judicial review in the Federal Court within 15 days.
Protected persons should seek legal advice before applying for or renewing a national passport, and before any travel to their country of nationality. A Canadian refugee travel document is generally the safer option for international travel until citizenship is obtained.
No. Permanent residents who obtained status as protected persons can still face cessation proceedings, and a final cessation decision can cause loss of PR status.
It can raise a presumption of re-availment, but the RPD must consider all the circumstances, and the presumption can be rebutted.
Cessation proceedings under s 108 concern refugee protection; once someone is a citizen, different rules apply. Seek advice on your specific situation.
If you received notice of a cessation application, contact Pax Law Corporation as early as possible.
The information presented is for informational and educational purposes only and may not be accurate. This information does not replace getting legal advice from a qualified, practicing lawyer. If you are facing a legal dilemma, you should make an appointment and consult with one of our licensed and practicing lawyers.

A single IRCC verification call can trigger a misrepresentation finding under IRPA s 40. Learn your rights and the innocent mistake exception.

Learn the Ezokola test for complicity and how IRPA s 35(1)(b) applies to prescribed senior officials, plus ministerial relief. Pax Law Corporation.

An incomplete application returned under IRPR s 12 is treated as never made. Learn how this affects your status and when a return can be challenged.
دفتر وکالت پکس لا
پکس لا
سلام! وقت مشاورهی خود را بهسرعت از طریق واتساپ رزرو کنید. تیم ما در اسرع وقت پاسخ خواهد داد.
Pax Law Corporation
Pax Law
Hello! Book your consultation quickly via WhatsApp. Our team will reply as soon as possible.
0 Comments