آیا دستگیر شدهاید یا به ارتکاب جرم کیفری متهم شدهاید؟
Home » خدمات حقوقی » وکیل حقوق کیفری در کانادا
وکیل کیفری پکس لا در تخصص خود تلاش میکند تا بهترین دفاع ممکن را برای موکلین فراهم کرده و اثرات منفی اتهامات را به حداقل برساند. ما درک میکنیم که این دوران برای شما دشوار است و اینجا هستیم تا به شما کمک کنیم.
دریافت اتهام کیفری میتواند شوکآور باشد. شما سزاوار وکیلی هستید که با تعهد کامل به پرسشهای شما پاسخ دهد، روند حقوقی را گامبهگام توضیح دهد و دادرسی با کیفیت بالا برایتان فراهم کند.
هدف ما این است که بهترین شانس برای نتیجهای مثبت در پروندهتان داشته باشید. ما بهطور خستگیناپذیر از جانب شما کار میکنیم تا بتوانید روی مهمترین چیز یعنی آینده خود تمرکز کنید. رویکرد ما این است که همه گزینههای ممکن را بررسی کنیم تا بهترین مسیر را برای آزادی شما پیدا کنیم.
وکیل جرم در کانادا از متهمان در تمام سطوح دادگاه دفاع میکند. همکار ما وکیل دادگستری در کانادا، ثمین مرتضوی، از وکلای برجسته و شناختهشده کیفری در نورث ونکوور است و تیم ما تجربه گستردهای در رسیدگی به پروندههای پیچیده دارد. با همکاری نزدیک با مشتریان، ما از شما دفاع میکنیم، وارد مذاکره با دادستانی میشویم و در صورت لزوم در دادگاه به نمایندگی از شما حاضر میشویم.
اگر به جرمی متهم یا دستگیر شدهاید، باید به صورت مشاوره حقوقی دریافت کنید. کمک گرفتن از یک وکیل حقوق کیفری در کانادا میتواند به شما کمک کند از داشتن سوءسابقه کیفری یا حکم سنگین زندان جلوگیری کنید.
بسته به تجربه وکیل، هزینه ممکن است بین ۲۵۰ دلار تا ۶۵۰ دلار در ساعت باشد. برخی وکیلها بیشتر از این نرخ یا بهصورت مبلغ ثابت کار میکنند. هزینه وکیل مدافع بستگی به نوع اتهام کیفری شما دارد.
وکیل مدافع نمایندگی اشخاصی را بر عهده دارد که به جرایم علیه دولت متهم شدهاند. وظایف اصلی شامل بررسی گزارشهای پلیس، مذاکره با دادستان (Crown Counsel) و دفاع از شما در دادگاه است.
اگر به جرم متهم شوید، میتوانید درخواست کمک حقوقی (Legal Aid) کنید. بسته به شرایط پرونده و وضعیت مالی شما، امکان دریافت وکیل رایگان وجود دارد که هزینههایش توسط دولت پرداخت میشود.
از چند ساعت تا چند سال میتواند طول بکشد. البته بیشتر پروندهها به محاکمه نمیرسند و در همان مراحل اولیه حلوفصل میشوند.
این موضوع توسط مرجع تشخیص واقعیت (Trier of Fact) تعیین میشود. در دادگاه، ممکن است تنها یک قاضی یا ترکیبی از چند قاضی و هیئت منصفه (۱۲ نفر از مردم) این تصمیم را بگیرند.
دادستان وکیلی دولتی است که از طرف دولت (Crown Counsel) پرونده را پیگیری میکند. وکیل مدافع، وکیلی خصوصی است که از افراد متهم به جرایم دفاع میکند.
خیر، حدود ۸۰ تا ۹۰ درصد از پروندههای مدنی پیش از رسیدن به دادگاه از طریق توافق حلوفصل میشوند.
اگر با اتهام کیفری روبهرو هستید و به دنبال وکیلی حرفهای، باتجربه و قابل اعتماد میگردید، همین امروز با شرکت حقوقی پکس لا تماس بگیرید.
EXCELLENT
Based on 880 reviews
Posted on Google![]()
Sina NajmiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a very good experience with Pax Law. I needed my PR card renewal sorted quickly because of an upcoming business trip, so I did some research and also asked ChatGPT for the best and fastest option in Vancouver. Pax Law came up as the first recommendation, so I gave them a call. They were friendly, very organised and paid attention to every detail. They understood the urgency and had everything prepared for me within two days, with really good communication and follow up throughout. Very happy with the service and would definitely recommend them.Posted on Google![]()
AMIR’s Wood GalleryTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience working with Ms. Sultani at Pax Law. She handled my case professionally and efficiently, and the entire process went smoothly. She was responsive, helpful, and clear throughout. I truly appreciate her support and would highly recommend her services.Posted on Google![]()
forouzan MollaeiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’m very grateful for the excellent guidance and professional support I received from Pax Law. They were knowledgeable, attentive, and truly took the time to understand my situation. I greatly appreciate the work they did for me and would highly recommend their services to anyone looking for a trustworthy and dedicated lawyer.Posted on Google![]()
Niloo HTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My experience with Pax Law did not start off well. My file was initially assigned to Ms. Parisa Pourhashemi, and unfortunately, I was very disappointed with the way my case was handled. There were several occasions when I had to repeatedly explain or defend documents that were actually correct. One particularly frustrating example involved our property deed. Ms. Pourhashemi firmly told me that the deed I had provided was incorrect and that the property was not in our name. She stated this with such certainty that I was genuinely shocked. What made this situation even more troubling was something Ms. Pourhashemi later wrote to me in an email. She told me, with complete confidence, that because I had supposedly provided her with an incorrect property deed, I was essentially in no position to criticize the quality of their work. I found this comment both disrespectful and extremely concerning. The very same property deed was subsequently sent to Mr. Haghjou, who reviewed it and confirmed that there was nothing wrong with it. So my question to Ms. Pourhashemi is this: how can you speak to a client with such certainty—and in such a dismissive manner—when the very premise of your statement turns out to be incorrect? If there was uncertainty about the document, I would have expected you to consult someone with greater knowledge or experience before making such a definitive statement and using it as a reason to dismiss a client’s legitimate concerns. This incident reflects one of the biggest problems I had with my experience. It was not simply about making a mistake. Mistakes happen. What concerned me was the combination of being extremely confident about something that ultimately turned out to be incorrect, not reconsidering that position, and then speaking to a client in a dismissive manner based on that incorrect conclusion. When the forms were eventually sent to me for final review before submission, I found numerous errors. What disappointed me most was what happened after I expressed my concerns. I communicated my disappointment politely and respectfully and explained that I did not feel my file had received the level of attention, care, and focus that I expected. In response, I received an email whose tone I found surprisingly harsh and unprofessional. I was genuinely shocked by it. In my opinion, anyone working directly with clients should be able to receive respectful feedback and respond professionally. Based on my personal experience, I do not believe the communication I received met that standard. For these reasons, based solely on my personal experience, I would not recommend having a visa application handled by Ms. Pourhashemi. That being said, I also believe in giving credit where it is deserved, and this is where my experience with Pax Law changed significantly for the better. Once my concerns were brought to Mr. Haghjou’s attention, the situation was handled very differently. He contacted me very quickly, obtained the necessary documents from me, carefully reviewed the issues I had raised, and moved the case forward promptly. I am genuinely grateful to Mr. Haghjou for the way he stepped in and managed the situation. His responsiveness, professionalism, attention to detail, and ability to resolve the issues gave me a much better impression of Pax Law as a firm. For that reason, despite the very negative experience I had at the beginning, I felt it would be unfair not to give Pax Law five stars overall. Update: Unfortunately, I left a review that was critical but respectful, and I felt that the response I received was unnecessarily confrontational. You stated that I had “yelled at your staff,” which I did not do. If you have a recording or any other evidence of this, I would appreciate it if you could provide it. You also stated that the issue regarding the document was an “ambiguity.” However, your staff member explicitly stated that I had sent the wrong document. All of the relevant communication and documentation is available in our email correspondence.Posted on Google![]()
AmberTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had an excellent experience with Pax Law and Samin Mortazavi as our lawyer when buying a condo. He was thorough, answered all of my questions, and double checked with his team during the meeting to make sure that all information was correct. Thanks for the great service!Posted on Google![]()
Amirshah ShahTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I recently had several questions regarding my mandatory military service in my home country, so I booked a consultation with **Pax Law Corporation**. The process was very smooth—I scheduled a 30-minute virtual consultation, paid the consultation fee, uploaded my identification documents, and met with Dr. Samin Mortazavi the following day. During the meeting, I explained my situation in detail. Dr. Mortazavi listened very carefully, answered all of my questions clearly and honestly, and explained both the legal aspects of my situation and the steps I should and should not take. I never felt rushed, and the entire consultation was professional, respectful, and informative. Even though I live in Alberta, the firm accommodated my schedule and arranged the meeting at a convenient time, which I greatly appreciated. Overall, it was a very productive conversation, and I am extremely happy with Dr. Mortazavi's professionalism, knowledge, and attitude. If I ever need immigration legal services in the future, he and his firm will be my first choice. I would also highly recommend Pax Law Corporation to anyone looking for reliable and professional immigration legal advice.Verified by TrustindexTrustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more
دیگر نیازی به پرداخت هزینههای سنگین تلفن بینالمللی ندارید
با خط اختصاصی ما در تهران، مستقیماً و با تعرفه تماس داخلی با دفاتر پکسلا در کانادا گفتگو کنید
لطفا به وقت اداری کانادا تماس بگیرید