KOTUN TARAYYA
Lauyoyin RUBUTU
| DOCKET: | Saukewa: MM-1305-22 |
| SALON DALILI: | AREZOO DADRAS NIA v MINISTAN CIJI DA HIJIRA |
| WURIN JI: | TA TARON VIDEO |
| RANAR JI: | SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 |
| HUKUNCI DA DALILAI: | AHMED J. |
| RANA: | NOVEMBER 29, 2022 |
BAYANI:
| Samin Mortazavi | GA MAI NEMAN |
| Nima Omidi | GA MAI AMSA |
Lauyoyin RUBUTU:
| Kamfanin Shari'a na Pax Barristers da Lauyoyin Arewacin Vancouver, British Columbia | GA MAI NEMAN |
| Babban Lauyan KanadaVancouver, British Columbia | GA MAI AMSA |
Wani hukuncin Kotun Tarayya da ya yi nasara ga Samin Mortazavi
Wanda ya shigar da kara a wannan shari'ar dan kasar Iran ne dan shekara 40. Ta yi aure kuma tana da babu masu dogara. Mijinta, iyayenta, da ƙanenta suna Iran, kuma ba ta da iyali a Kanada. A lokacin yin takardar visa ta kasance a Spain. A lokacin ta yi aure kuma ba ta da abin dogaro. Mijinta, iyayenta, da ɗan'uwanta suna Iran, kuma tana da babu iyali a Kanada. A halin yanzu tana zama a Spain. Tun daga shekarar 2019, mai neman ta yi aiki a matsayin mai ba da shawara kan bincike a Kamfanin Nedaye Nasim-e-Shomal da ke Tehran, inda take daidaitawa da ba da ƙware kan ayyukan zartarwa don canza sharar gida zuwa makamashi mai amfani. Ta ci gaba da aiki a nan nesa ba kusa ba yayin da take Spain.
[20] Mai nema ya gabatar da cewa shawarar da Jami'in ya yanke ba shi da ma'ana saboda ba shi da tsarin bincike na hankali dangane da gaskiya da shaida. Halin da jami'ar ta yi na shirin NYIT a matsayin ƙaramar ilimi fiye da digirin da mai nema ya yi a baya ya yi watsi da manufarta na ci gaba da shirin, wanda shine don ci gaba da aikinta na sarrafa makamashi. Mai nema ya gabatar da cewa wannan tushe na ƙin yarda ya ci karo da hukuncin da wannan Kotun ta yanke a ciki Monteza da Kanada (Ministan zama ɗan ƙasa da shige da fice), 2022 FC 530 da para 13 ("Monteza"
). Maimakon tantance shaidar da ta dace da ke nuna cewa shirin ci gaba ne mai ma'ana a cikin aikin mai nema kuma ita ce na ainihi ɗalibi, Jami'in ya ɗauki matsayin mai ba da shawara na aiki, wanda wannan Kotun ta sami rashin hankali (Adom v Kanada ('Yan Kasa da Shige da Fice), 2019 FC 26 na paras 16-17) ("Adom"
).
A cikin sakin layi na 22 alkali ya rubuta, hukuncin da Jami’in ya yanke bai dace ba domin ya dogara ne akan abin da bai taka kara ya karya ba, wanda ya saba wa fikihu, kuma yana yin hakan ne domin samun gamsassun hujjoji masu nuni da akasin haka. Ƙimar da Jami'in ya yi game da shaidun ya ƙunshi babban gibi a cikin tunani, kuma ba shi da wani dalili dangane da hujjoji da ƙuntatawa na shari'a (Vavilov da para 105). Ko da a lokuta da ke da taƙaitaccen dalili ko babu dalilin yanke shawara, dole ne a sake duba shawarar gaba ɗaya don tabbatar da cewa ta kasance a bayyane, fahimta kuma ta tabbata (Vavilov da para 15). Ba aikin wannan Kotun ba ne don sake aunawa ko sake duba shaidun da ke gaban Jami'in, amma dole ne a tabbatar da yanke shawara mai ma'ana ta la'akari da bayanan shaida (Vavilov na paras 125-126).
[30] Kin amincewar Jami'in na neman izinin karatu na mai nema ba shi da ma'ana saboda bai ƙunshi layin bincike mai ma'ana ba wanda ya dace bisa ga shaidar. Shawarar musamman ta gaza yin lissafin shaidar da ke nuna manufar mai nema na neman ƙarin digiri don samun ƙwarewa a fagenta. An ba da wannan aikace-aikacen don nazarin shari'a. Ba a gabatar da tambayoyin takaddun shaida ba, kuma na yarda cewa babu wanda ya taso.
Alkalin ya karasa da cewa:
[30] Kin amincewar Jami'in na neman izinin karatu na mai nema ba shi da ma'ana saboda bai ƙunshi layin bincike mai ma'ana ba wanda ya dace bisa ga shaidar. Shawarar musamman ta gaza yin lissafin shaidar da ke nuna manufar mai nema na neman ƙarin digiri don samun ƙwarewa a fagenta. An ba da wannan aikace-aikacen don nazarin shari'a. Ba a gabatar da tambayoyin takaddun shaida ba, kuma na yarda cewa babu wanda ya taso.
Visit Samin Mortazavi shafi don samun ƙarin bayani.
0 Comments